In-Laws from Hell·
DINNER DICTATOR
A couple navigates a long running money saving meal plan where a rigid father overrides dietary needs, sparking a clash that forces them to redraw boundaries and redefine family dinners.
Keep accepting dinner or start cooking themselves?
Be one of the first to vote.
The food dispute started with a favor: a pregnant woman's parents kept buying groceries and cooking dinners for all four adults so she and her husband could save money for the baby. But the help came with a catch, her father controlled almost every meal, and his menu barely changed.
The 28-year-old poster and her 31-year-old husband live in their own house right next to her parents. Her mother would buy groceries, and her father would cook dinner for everyone. On paper, it sounded generous. In practice, it meant the same small rotation of basic meals, over and over, with little room for input.
That became a problem fast once pregnancy kicked in.
She said she developed strong food aversions, and now about five of the six meals her father makes make her gag. Simple changes might have helped. More seasoning. A different ingredient. A small adjustment so she could actually eat without feeling sick. But each time she tried to suggest a tweak, her father shut it down.
"nah, nah, nah, it's better this way," he told her.
When she pointed out that she used to like the food, he pushed back again: "you used to like it" and "you have ate it that way for 30 years."
The poster said his reactions weren't just stubborn, they were rigid to the point of absurdity. One example was chicken pie. She said he insisted, "NO. Chicken pie has BOILED chicken." Another meal was apparently so fixed in his mind that he described it as "the best thing ever," even when she asked for small changes. If she suggested anything else, it became "too complicated" or "too expensive," or he claimed "he doesn't know how to get the ingredients."
Her mother kept stepping in to defend him, saying they were trying and framing it as "saving money for the baby." The poster said she appreciated the help, but felt dismissed every time she turned down food or asked for something she could tolerate.
In the edit, she drew a clearer line: she and her husband do not need her parents to feed them. They can cook for themselves and pay for their own groceries. The real issue, she said, is that her parents want them over for meals and get upset when they choose not to come because of her food aversions.
What began as a money-saving arrangement turned into a fight over who gets to decide what goes on the plate, and why the dinners were never really just about dinner.