Money & Inheritance·
THE PUP THAT GOT SUED
An Ohio poster faces a breeder's threat of lawsuit after rehoming a purebred dog, arguing no contract binds them as tensions rise toward legal action.
Keep the dog or return it?
Be one of the first to vote.
The breeder said she would sue to get the dog back.
That was the first thing the Ohio poster heard when the call turned serious. The dog in question was not a piece of paperwork or a vague custody dispute, but "a beautiful purebred dog" the poster had been living with for nearly two months, and now the breeder who originally sold the dog to someone else wanted the animal returned.
The poster says they met the dog's first owner through a mutual friend. At the time, that owner was going through "a difficult period," and the dog had been "at the sitter or being cared for by friends." Because the poster already had experience with that type of dog, the first owner rehomed the animal with them.
What followed, by the poster's account, was uncomplicated and happy. "Things have done great," they wrote. "I love this dog very much." The dog settled in, and the poster believed the placement was exactly what the animal needed.
Then the breeder found out the dog had been rehomed.
According to the poster, the breeder said the first owner had signed a contract requiring the dog to be returned to the breeder rather than placed elsewhere. Rehoming the dog, the breeder said, violated that agreement. The breeder demanded the dog be returned, or else she would sue.
The first owner relayed all of this to the poster, who then called the breeder directly. Hoping to reassure her that the dog had not been abandoned or "dumped with someone unqualified," the poster left a phone number and waited.
The breeder called back.
This time, the demand was the same: return the dog, or face a lawsuit.
That left the poster in a bind. They said they had "didn't sign a contract with anyone" and were "completely unaware of any contractual obligations owed by the 1st owner to the breeder." The poster asked whether the breeder could actually sue successfully, and whether she could take the dog.
In later edits, the poster added more details. The dog is already fixed, and the first owner handled that. The breeder, they said, is a "reputable AKC breeder and exhibitor of an uncommon breed of dog." And while the situation was tense, the poster stressed that "I can't say there is any harassment going on between the breeder and I."
In fact, the breeder was described as "not even super unpleasant." She offered to meet in person, fill out a puppy application, provide references, and send pictures. The poster said, "I think she really cares about the dogs she produces and wants good homes."
For now, the breeder has not contacted the poster again. The last update was simple: "She said she'd be talking to her attorney next week."