In-Laws from Hell·
DINNER DELAY DISPUTE
At a family dinner, a 5:15 plan to save money erupts into a clash over entitlement, manipulation, and stubborn timing, leaving the poster confronted with a hard truth.
Wait for the cheaper dinner or head out early?
Be one of the first to vote.
At 5:15 p.m., a dinner plan at someone else's house turned into a fight about money, patience, and a chorus of suddenly starving children.
Two weeks ago, a 32-year-old poster was hosting family at their home with their 29-year-old spouse. The group included the poster's in-laws, the spouse's sister, and the sister's kids. While the adults caught up, the poster was outside doing chalk art with the children. Lunch had been very light, and there were snacks out for everyone to graze on.
As dinner got closer, the sister-in-law suggested heading down to eat. The poster said no, it was only 5:15, and they should wait until 6:00. There was a coupon, the poster explained, and dinner would be much cheaper then: around $175 instead of under $75.
That answer did not go over well.
The sister-in-law grumbled and went to check on the kids and their chalk supplies. A few minutes later, the children came out acting dramatically hungry. One of them, the poster said, launched into the kind of complaint that makes a room go quiet: "I'm soooooo hungry."
The poster felt the timing was too convenient. In their view, the children had been used to push the adults into leaving early. The poster's mother-in-law and father-in-law decided to go ahead and head down for dinner. The spouse said they could wait, but the sister said no and started getting the kids ready to go.
That was when the poster snapped.
While the children ran inside, the poster told the sister-in-law, "Using your children to emotionally manipulate people into getting your way is pathetic."
The sister-in-law shot back immediately. She said everyone was hungry and told the poster, "everyone is hungry, just get over it, if you couldn't afford to pay for dinner then you shouldn't have offered."
The poster later said they could understand that point, they had offered to pay, but still wondered whether waiting 45 minutes was really such a huge ask.
In an edit, the poster said they had been reading responses and realized they had missed something bigger: apparently, having people over at their house meant an official hosting event, and that might come with expectations. They joked that maybe children do not eat sandwiches anymore and that they would need catering next time.
"It seems that I just didn't know that by having people over at our house if was an official event that required hosting," the poster wrote, adding, "boy you guys did not think this was as funny as I did."
They also added, "Idk I'm learning a lot about different families and stuff like sandwiches aren't real food."